Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 10:47

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Rocket Report: SpaceX’s 500th Falcon launch; why did UK’s Reaction Engines fail? - Ars Technica
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thousands of Kroger, Albertsons grocery store workers vote to strike - KIRO 7 News Seattle
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
If Humans Become Extinct, This Is the Species That Will Take Over the Planet - The Daily Galaxy
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Aut explicabo sapiente quis consequuntur fuga consectetur fugit.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Newspaper headlines: Spending Review 'renewing Britain' or 'reckless splurge' - BBC
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
SEC Raises Legal Questions Over Proposed Ethereum, Solana ETFs - Decrypt